| Health & Management / Mammal Husbandry and Management / List of hyperlinked Techniques & Protocols: |
< > Mammal Identification: |
Rabbits
Transponders
Introduction and General Information |
|
|---|---|
It is important to be
able to identify animals correctly at both the species (and subspecies if relevant) and
individual animal level.Reasons to identify species
Reasons to identify individuals/groups of individualsThere are a variety of reasons why identification of individuals or groups of individuals is wanted or required, including:
Identification methodsThe ideal means of individual identification should be:
(B22.5.w2, B429.5.w5, B438.24.w24, J232.44.w1) Additional considerations
(B22.5.w2, B36.6.w6, B130.3.w1, B429.5.w5, B438.24.w24, B512.w12, D15, J23.8.w3, J23.8.w4, J23.8.w5, J23.8.w6, J23.8.w7, J23.8.w8 P4.1994.w3, P1.1976.w3) |
|
Bear Considerations |
As with other mammals, bears
should be identified to species (and subspecies, if relevant), and as
individuals.
|
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Species IdentificationAccurate identification of species is very important in wildlife rehabilitation, particularly for example in North America, accurate distinction between wild-colour domestic rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus - European rabbit) and native cottontail rabbits.
Individual animal identification
|
| Ferret Consideration |
Distinguishing between polecat-marked Mustela putorius
furo
- Ferrets and their wild progenitors (probably)
Mustela putorius -
Polecats is difficult. (B656) As with all animals, it is very important to ensure accurate identification of each individual ferret while in veterinary care, to ensure correct treatment. (V.w5) |
| Bonobo Consideration |
Bonobos were recognised as a separate species from Pan troglodytes - Chimpanzee relatively recently. The small number of in human care are all recognised by their individual characteristics. Studies in the wild also make use of individual apperance for identification.
|
Published Guidelines linked in Wildpro |
|
Identification of Species |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(V.w5). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bear Considerations |
There are a number of
characteristics which can be used to distinguish between the different
bear species.
For further descriptions and information on identification of the individual bear species see the species pages linked from List of Bear Species |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Lagomorphs (rabbits, hares and pikas) can be distinguished from rodents by
the presence of a second pair of incisor teeth behind the first pair;
these cannot easily be seen. (B10.45.w47,
B611.3.w3)
Care is required to distinguish between different lagomorph groups and species. In the UK, the three species of wild lagomorphs can be distinguished as follows:
Further information on species identification and distinguishing features for individual species is provided on the species pages linked from the List of Lagomorph Species - SEARCH & List |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ferret Consideration | While identification of many
colours of domestic ferrets (e.g. albino or white ferrets) as ferrets is
quite simple, it can be very difficult to distinguish between a polecat
ferret (also known as a fitch - a domestic ferret with natural polecat
colour markings) and a true
polecat. A combinations of features are used to distinguish between true
polecats and polecat ferrets. Ferrets usually have one or more of the
following pelage characteristics: (B656)
(B656) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Bonobo Consideration | Bonobos were only recognised
as a distinct species separate from Pan troglodytes - Chimpanzee
relatively recently. Bonobos are distinguished by physical features as
follows:
It is important that bonobos are recognised as distinct from their close relatives, Pan troglodytes - Chimpanzee. Differences from Pan troglodytes - Chimpanzees include:
See also: Pan paniscus - Bonobo - General Appearance |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Natural Markings |
|
|---|---|
|
Use of natural markings and variations to identify individual animals has a long history. Where natural markings can be used in this way they have advantages of providing permanent identification without any interference with the animal. In the past, use of natural markings for recognition generally has been limited to species with clearly distinguishable coat patterns, recognition of individuals with marks such as scars, and long-term research where the researchers gradually learn to identify individuals within their study populations. Recently, computer aided recognition has been used and has widened the application of identification from natural markings.
Hand and Foot Prints
Nose prints
Ear prints
(B13.1.w18, B36.6.w6, B105.19.w6, B130.3.w1, B429.5.w5, D381, J182.42.w1, J232.44.w1, J332.82.w1, P4.1194.w3) |
|
Bear Considerations
|
Natural markings may be used
to distinguish individual bears in some circumstances.
Nose prints
Whisker spot patterns
|
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Natural markings can be used for identification if:
|
| Ferret Consideration |
|
| Bonobo Consideration |
Bonobos can be recognised as individuals without using any artificial
markings. (B577.3.w3)
|
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
Temporary Artificial Markings |
|
|---|---|
|
Temporary artificial markings are useful when short-term identification of individuals or a sub-set of a population is needed. These marks usually do not harm or hurt the animal in any way, although care must be taken to consider the effects on thermoregulation and waterproofing if hair is clipped.
Dyes, Sprays and Paints
Hair Clipping/shaving
Nocturnal lights
Fluorescent powders
Punch marking
(B105.19.w6, B130.12.w4, B429.5.w5, J23.8.w4, J147.3.w1, J232.44.w1, P17.49.w1, V.w5, V.w144) |
|
Bear Considerations |
|
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Dyes, Sprays and Paints
Hair Clipping/shaving
|
| Ferret Consideration | |
| Bonobo Consideration | -- |
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
Permanent Artificial Markings |
|
|---|---|
|
A variety of methods have been used to permanently mark animals either to indicate ownership or to identify individuals. By their nature, permanent marking techniques are more invasive than are temporary marking techniques, and creating the marks may involve a certain, usually minor, amount of pain for the animal. Each permanent artificial marking method varies in its applicability to a given species, and on its use for different situations such as reading at a distance or confirming identity on close examination. Methods which are easy to read at a distance also tend to be more obtrusive to people (e.g. members of the public in a zoo) watching the animal. Tattoos
Freeze branding
Horn branding
Ear clipping or punching
Foot web holes or slits
Toe clipping
|
|
Bear Considerations |
Tattoos:
Ear clipping or punching
Freeze branding |
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Rabbits can be permanently identified by means of ear tattoos. In
the USA, this is the required identification method for rabbits being
exhibited. (B601.1.w1)
Ear tattoos are used for individual identification of
laboratory rabbits (B614.2.w2)
and wild rabbits being studied. (B486.13.w13,
J40.18.w10,
J81.30.w1)
Note: |
| Ferret Consideration |
|
| Bonobo Consideration | |
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
Rings, Bands & Tags |
|
|---|---|
Ear tags are
commonly used for identification of mammals. Tags of a variety of sizes
and designs have been developed for use in livestock, so they are cheap
and readily available.
Placing ear tagsPlastic tags are usually made in two pieces, one with a hole and the other bearing a post with a sharpened point. Using an applicator, the point is driven through the ear and locked into the hole in the other piece of the tag.
Ways to use ear tags for identification
Tags for small mammals
Streamers
Problems of ear tags
Collars
|
|
Bear Considerations |
Ear TagsEar tags are commonly used in studies of bears in the wild to identify individual bears. (D248.w3, D249.w10, D283.w2, J40.32.w1, J40.35.w1, J46.234.w1, J332.65.w1, J332.86.w1, J343.52.w2, J345.14.w4)
Collars |
| Lagomorph Consideration |
Leg rings
Ear tags
CollarsCollars, particularly collars holding radiotransmitters, have been used on a variety of lagomorph species, although some problems have been noted with collars of at least two different designs used on Sylvilagus bachmani - Brush rabbit.
|
| Ferret Consideration |
Ear tags
Collars
|
| Bonobo Consideration | -- |
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
Electronic Identification |
|
|---|---|
Microchips (transponders, PIT tags) are potentially permanent, unique identifiers which may be used in most animal species. Each transponder consists of a small cylinder of glass coated with special inert coating and containing a microchip with a unique electronic identifying number.
Advantages of transponders
Disadvantages of transponders
Choice of implantation site
Method of implantation
|
|
Bear Considerations |
Implantable transponder chips
(microchips) can be used for the permanent identification of individual bears both
in zoos and in the wild. (D250,
J40.65.w2,
J46.256.w1, J343.52.w2,
J345.14.w1)
Site for implantation in bears
|
|
Lagomorph Consideration
|
|
| Ferret Consideration |
|
| Bonobo Consideration |
|
| Associated techniques linked from Wildpro | |
DNA "Fingerprinting" |
|
|---|---|
DNA
"fingerprinting" may be used for identification at both the species and the
individual level.
|
|
Bear Considerations |
DNA
may be collected from
bears in the wild when they are being handled (D249.w10),
or without handling, by setting up attractants surrounded by a
single-strand barbed wire fence; bears investigating the attractant leave
hairs caught in the barbs. (J59.27.w1,
J179.2005online.w1)
Use of DNA analysis in bears
|
| Lagomorph Consideration |
DNA analysis has been used in studies of wild lagomorphs for:
|
| Ferret Consideration | Genetically, mitochondrial DNA analysis has shown two mitochondrial haptotypes of polecats in Britain, a "Welsh polecat" type and a "domestic ferret" type. However, this is not sufficient to distinguish between domestic ferrets and wild polecats: the "domestic ferret" haplotype was also found in a phenotypically pure Mustela putorius - Polecat from Slovenia. (J17.87.w1) |
| Bonobo Consideration |
|
Associated techniques linked from Wildpro |
|
Authors & Referees |
|
|---|---|
Authors |
Debra Bourne MA VetMB PhD MRCVS (V.w5) |
Referee |
Liz Carter BSc MSC (V.w144); Neil Dorman (V.w104); Mike Jordan (V.w30); Chris Lasher (V.w110) |